• minitester on Business Models for Skype Developers

  Obviously Niklas Zennström is a great mutherf****r.

• Hans Blaauw on Business Models for Skype Developers

  Making money with Skype is not easy but in my opinion possible.

  From my experience with other non-technical users and companies that don't have a IT specialist Skype is not that clear at all. So there is a way to make money with consultancy and solutions.

  People normally don't look for just a software package they look for a solution for a problem.

• Julian Bond on Business Models for Skype Developers

  Exactly the same way as with any open source development. By adding value via a service not by selling code. So this means that there are plenty of opportunities around areas like distributed call centres or micro-consulting that charges for time.

  But trying to make money from your particular extension is a dead end for all the reasons given. That doesn't mean that it's not worth doing, just that the rewards are soft in terms of reputation not hard in terms of direct cash reward.

• tommy_sheu on Business Models for Skype Developers

  As one of the developers, I think we still have a good chance. 3rd party can provides a excellent and profitable Skype-service idea to Skype. With some unique technology that Skype can't do by itself, Skype needs to cooperate with 3rd party. Afterward both Skype and 3rd party will benefit from this new service.

• Stuart on Business Models for Skype Developers

  Actually, I believe there is some thought emerging on how to make money. There are three clear developer areas that emerge. Each presents different challenges.

  1) Hardware Integration: This is the simplest in terms of how does one make a buck and I believe the thrust of the initial API. Two opportunities emerge. One developing the API to integrate with hardware means that if I buy a dual-phone and later want to use it with another system similar to Skype then new companies will want to look very carefully at integrating or emulating Skype API functionality. The cost of hardware locks people in. Hardware vendors get a premium or first to market advantage.

  2) Augmented Services: Many sites from social networking to forums to online marketplaces would be made better by integrating Skype. The development effort here has a different payoff. It may not be direct dollars, it is value added for their customer base. Improving communications etc adds value. The cost of these implementations can be quite low.

  3)Add-On applications. These are the most difficult. They are most likely to be absorbed into Skype in some way over time. Sites from Groove to Netscape have had plug-ins and enhancements and like MS Word.. in the end only one Spell-checker was absorbed. Where is there immediate opportunity? Presence, profiles, and money. Skype could make this better by creating a Firefox like plug-in strategy and making it clearer to developers what their path is.

  There is nothing wrong with creating a market for free. In fact we know the calls aren't free. Most of us paid a fixed fee to access the bandwidth. To really make it free, services need to be created that lower the cost even more for Skypers. That means that Skypers must earn money, get paid for using it. Skype can't afford to do that. However other commercial interests are certainly interested in connecting with Skypers. As the community grows the value of that attention becomes ever more valuable.

  In summary, I think there are many opportunities even for the applications. The "presence" element in my view remains an opportunity for "independent" developers.

  I'd also suggest that some independent developers are selling their developments short. Many of these are prototypes. Many companies should be paying to get some of these rapid prototypes done. Either to get the jump on the competition, get the learning or negotiate with Skype so it is brought in the product in the future. The benefit from organizations prototyping and funding early development of these tools is they learn both how to use and apply them and more importantly they get an indepth understanding of the changed "behavior". Thus much is running from hypothesis to benchmarked improvements.

  I believe every company should be in the business of considering how to improve their conversations.

• Rick on Business Models for Skype Developers

  It appears a developer needs to use Skype as a piece of a bigger product, rather than develop a piece to be used for Skype. Put another way, use Skype for your product, not vice versa.

  For instance, create a game or dating service that employs Skype. I read today where someone is going to put Skype into their Wimax voip for games.

• continued in the Skype Journal Comment River: 200 fresh comments

Skype Links

Author's Posts

• Phil Wolff
• Jim Courtney
• Martin Geddes
• Guest Bloggers

Thanks to our Founding Alumni:
• Stuart Henshall
• Bill Campbell

Archives

• November 2006
• October 2006
• September 2006
• August 2006
• July 2006
• June 2006
• May 2006
• April 2006
• March 2006
• February 2006
• January 2006
• December 2005
• November 2005
• October 2005
• September 2005
• August 2005
• July 2005
• June 2005
• May 2005
• April 2005
• March 2005
• February 2005
• January 2005
• December 2004
• November 2004
• October 2004
• September 2004
• August 2004
• July 2004
• June 2004
• May 2004
• April 2004
• March 2004
• February 2004
• January 2004
• December 2003
• November 2003
• October 2003
• September 2003

Featured Events