Chatting with Mathew Gould today, provided a few new pointers and wrinkles worth considering for Skype Strategy for Sip. These are issues and questions raised from our chat.
If Skype introduces a SIP gateway --- is that not contradictory to their P2P model that lets them scale massively? Thus for a SIP gateway to work with the Skype model would there not have to be a charging structure. Thus if I want SIP access then I pay an annual flat fee for it. Then is SIP so messy that this wouldn't scale well anyways? What happens with the encryption issues?
What if this was executed differently by providing a
local Skype proxy. Then Wi-Fi phones would work for example. What if the SIP proxy enabled Skype to peer with Vonage behind the scenes (ENUM) so that it knew to pass the call over SIP. I bet there are other devices that would further accelerate this trend. Would this enable you to use your SIP phones Wi-Fi or not in home and office?
In the enterprise situation would using a local SIP proxy enable two parties to set up a call using SIP while the enterprise remains firewalled and yet still work when connected with all the Skype features? (I really don't know quite what I'm asking)
What's the downside. The SIP connections are likely to have less functionality. Contrast the SIP solution with phones and devices enabled using the API and you may not get all the features. Possibly Skype should consider the impact on the user experience.
Should Skype let me point to a different SIP proxy for a price premium?
Is it an opportunity for Skype to write the standards, in a way that "brings" prices down. If Skype brings manufactured Wi-Fi phones into the picture, could they harness and shape their future development? Skype doesn't embed well into WiFI hardphones because it is non-standard to SIP, and the solution would traditionally break the P2P model. Could Skype demand "audio" quality standards for their SIP interconnect while retaining the addional functionality provided my devices that use the API?
Part of this argument may be completely redundant from a consumer point of view. I raised it because of enterprise and industry issues, the capability to add e-mails to the "names" and thus add another level for potential "reputation" and access management, etc. Where consumers are concerned they want more mobility where and whenever they are on Skype. A Wi-Fi SIP phone may be a complicated solution when a USB device can turn a tradtiional cordless phone into a fully functioning buddylist capable handset. Similarly a PDA may work real well on the move.
Dependent on Skype's growth it may be a "mute" point. As a competitor consider what would if mean if Skype has a SIP bullet ready to fire at any time. One reason I raise the SIP Skype question is a few industry elements and open source advocates consistently raise an open standards argument. None of the big guys are open. So weigh in. Could Skype making a SIP move further accelerate change in the industry?