Skype Journal

Home - Contact Us - Policies - Advertise - About News feed Independently covering the Talk Revolution since 2003

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Research Topics in Collaboration

I wanted to follow up on my Monday post about the importance of collaboration products to Skype's business strategy. The great thing about collaboration is that it is very hard. Collaboration is less a discipline than a catchall term. It's peopleware more than technology, anecdotes more than evidence. Universities have no Collaboration Studies department in schools of business, humanities, engineering, or medicine. Industry and governments study collaboration but produce narrow benefits, poorly shared.

Frankly, there's no Collaboration Science to inform the design of the next generation of tools like Skype.

Society needs it. The web needs it. I want to do it.

So what questions about collaborative behavior and collective productivity could investigations answer? Which avenues could radically improve the ability of live and time-shifted talk to become work effort? What collaboration patterns and social software designs can break down barriers and bridge teams and connect project stakeholders?

I made a list and called it Skype Journal - Research Topics in Collaboration (not attempting any creativity there). The research areas showed four themes:

  • Talk is a component within larger relationships
  • Talk systems are part of a larger interconnected network of information systems
  • Work adds constraints that help focus conversation
  • Collaboration as collective productivity

and the topics fell in three clusters:

  • Getting Started (Ridiculously Easy Group Formation; Group Goal Forming; To Do Lists, Calendars, Personal Time Management, and Getting Things Done Together; Fame and Reputation)
  • Being Better Together (Augmenting Inline Conversation; From Discovery to Action; Decision Making and Decision Support; Collaboration Afoot; Situational Awareness; How Collaborators Use Search and Personal/Collective memory; Gestures of Tomorrow)
  • Crossing Boundaries (Intergroup Collaboration; Earning Trust and Using Whuffie; Collective Presence and Project Presence/ActivityStreams; Transparency and Collaboration; Backchannels; Scaling Collaboration from Tasks to Projects to Programmes)

It's a quick read, needs pictures and I consider this a rough, incomplete draft. The questions are a sample to get a feel for the space to be studied. 

How can we answer the questions? Research. Each topic is amenable to a different blend of usability testing, instrumented communication tools, prototyping, field ethnography of high function collaborative teams, and analysis of data from virtual teams.

I'd like to assemble a body of knowledge that turns our digital tin-cans-with-strings into engines of effectiveness.

Help me kick start this. (Yes, this is a bit self-referential.) What topics are missing? Prior art? Can this research occur in an open space or must it happen inside a corporate firewall? Of all the research topics, which ones are low-hanging fruit and which are harder to reach but outstanding value? Here's the pdf.

Skype Journal - Research Topics in Collaboration - 2009q4

 

 

 

tags: , , , , , ,

Call me at +1-510-316-9773, Skype me, follow @skypejournal and @Phil Wolff.
Visit our Skype Journal private roundtable, one of the longest running public Skype chats.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

4 Comments:

At October 21, 2009 9:34 PM , Anonymous Seb Paquet said...

Is this Skype-centric, or are you thinking about collaboration in general?

This is an ambitious but very worthy research program. Of course it needs to exist.

Off the top of my head, here's a little prior work:

1) Howard Rheingold and others have been working for a while on "a science of cooperation"; see e.g. http://networkedpublics.org/about_netpublics/howard_rheingold_technologies_cooperation

2) Eugene Eric Kim and Blue Oxen Associates started a Collaboration Collaboratory a while back. There was a flurry of activity, but I think it is now dormant.

3) The field of computer-supported collaborative work has been looking at this, but I believe its formative years were the 80s and 90s and I'm unsure how aware it is of what's happening right here, right now.

4) In Omaha there is an Institute for Collaboration Science: http://ics.ist.unomaha.edu/

 
At October 23, 2009 9:45 AM , Blogger Howard said...

Thanks for the heads-up about this Seb. A couple of other resources:

My TED talk on "Way new collaboration"
http://www.ted.com/talks/howard_rheingold_on_collaboration.html

Cooperation Commons: http://cooperationcommons.com

Introduction to Cooperation Theory studies
http://blip.tv/file/230580

Collaboration is a focused subset of the broader landscape of cooperation and collective action.

 
At October 24, 2009 10:21 AM , Blogger eekim said...

Thanks, Seb, for the reference. Collaboration Collaboratory isn't as active as it used to be, but it's still a great resource, and I've continued to live in it.

http://blueoxen.net/

I've also been in the process of putting together a set of slidecasts outlining frameworks for understanding collaboration, including:

http://www.slideshare.net/eekim/collaboration-model

 
At December 16, 2009 4:08 AM , Blogger Sebastien said...

The OpenKollab hub might be seen as an "applied arm"/"live lab" of Collaboration Science.

http://wiki.openkollab.com/Home

 

Post a Comment

We've started to moderate comments to avoid spam. Please excuse the short delay. We'll get your post online a quickly as possible.

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home